nativeboost google groups

> subscribe and you're done,
>
> the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client.
> For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
>
>
> On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image
>> and the discussion should be here as well.
>
> valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by
> NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
>
> Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially
> the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
>
>> Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able
>> to follow or find...
>
> invalid point:
> well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have
> a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum
> on http://forum.world.st/
>
>> Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
>
> nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...

> well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.?
> jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
>
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> subscribe and you're done,
>>
>> the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client.
>> For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
>>
>>
>> On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image
>>> and the discussion should be here as well.
>>
>> valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by
>> NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
>>
>> Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially
>> the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
>>
>>> Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able
>>> to follow or find...
>>
>> invalid point:
>> well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have
>> a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum
>> on http://forum.world.st/
>>
>>> Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
>>
>> nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
>
>

> well.. I more or less agree with Torsten (even if I already subscribed): component parts of Pharo should be kept together, otherwise... why not to create a group for mophic, for zinc, for filesystem, etc.?
> jutst to have a nice header? do you know you have some rules that you can apply to auto-label mails? :)
>
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> subscribe and you're done,
>>
>> the thing you get for Free is a decent title in the message in your mail client.
>> For me that saves a couple of second on each mail to check about what it is.
>>
>>
>> On 2013-01-29, at 08:40, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image
>>> and the discussion should be here as well.
>>
>> valid point. but then again, we will anyway allways announce changes made by
>> NativeBoost automatically via the update mails.
>>
>> Besides, the issue tracker is also no longer in the mailinglist, which is essentially
>> the heart of development? How do you argue in favor of that?
>>
>>> Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able
>>> to follow or find...
>>
>> invalid point:
>> well then the INRIA mailing lists are the worst place since they don't have
>> a proper index either. the only thing that get's indexed is the mapped forum
>> on http://forum.world.st/
>>
>>> Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
>>
>> nah, my personal opinion outweighs, besides you're always free to not use it...
>
>

> I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image
> and the discussion should be here as well.
>
> Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able
> to follow or find...
>
> Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>

>
> On Friday, February 1, 2013, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I hate to revive this discussion, but I am confused... What has been
>> decided about NB ? Are we supposed to continue using pharo list? Or the
>> Google group started by Camillo?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> I agree.
>> Especially for core elements. I do not fully understand nativeboost but I
>> like to read the messages
>> and question because I learn the domain
>> like NBHandle….
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> > I dislike outsourcing it to a google group. NB is now part of the image
>> > and the discussion should be here as well.
>> >
>> > Otherwise we end up with too many places nobody will be able
>> > to follow or find...
>> >
>> > Please close the group since it adds more confusion.
>> >
>> > Bye
>> > T.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>