nativeboost google groups

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

nativeboost google groups

Torsten Bergmann
Hi Camillo,

<just kidding>
OK I now created a google group for mophic, I also created one for zinc, for filesystem
and since it is now all there please stop using this mailinglist...
</just kidding>

Sorry - couldnt resist ;)

But with your action on creating a google group for NB I'm now not sure if Igor
and others continue to use the mailinglist here or the group you just created.
This is what I meant with confusion ...

Wouldnt it have been better to first discuss this here on the list if it is
necessary to outsource and others feel the need to have a separate place to discuss
NB deeper.
From my side I'm totally fine to keep it here - especially since most NB related
discussions will influence Pharos direction anyway.

As you know the separate issue tracker is historic - but I agree with you that we
should discuss where to maintain NB issues now after that NB is integrated
and part of the image.

Thanks
T.


 





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: nativeboost google groups

Stéphane Ducasse
Yes this what what my why? question was implying.

Stef

On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:

> Hi Camillo,
>
> <just kidding>
> OK I now created a google group for mophic, I also created one for zinc, for filesystem
> and since it is now all there please stop using this mailinglist...
> </just kidding>
>
> Sorry - couldnt resist ;)
>
> But with your action on creating a google group for NB I'm now not sure if Igor
> and others continue to use the mailinglist here or the group you just created.
> This is what I meant with confusion ...
>
> Wouldnt it have been better to first discuss this here on the list if it is
> necessary to outsource and others feel the need to have a separate place to discuss
> NB deeper.
> From my side I'm totally fine to keep it here - especially since most NB related
> discussions will influence Pharos direction anyway.
>
> As you know the separate issue tracker is historic - but I agree with you that we
> should discuss where to maintain NB issues now after that NB is integrated
> and part of the image.
>
> Thanks
> T.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>