on the way to smalltalkimage/systemdictionary

> Hi guys
>
> I think that we should remove all the code that is not about class management from SystemDictionary.
> this is the easy part.
>
> Now what do we do for the class management behavior defined in Smalltalk image (allclasses, allTraits, associationsAt:, at:, at:put:.......)
> because now this code is in systemDictionary
>
>        - we could replace Smalltalk
>                by Smalltalk globals
>
>        - deprecate the Smalltalk associationAt:.at:...and others
>
> What do you think?
>

> On 20 March 2010 15:38, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I think that we should remove all the code that is not about class management from SystemDictionary.
>> this is the easy part.
>>
>> Now what do we do for the class management behavior defined in Smalltalk image (allclasses, allTraits, associationsAt:, at:, at:put:.......)
>> because now this code is in systemDictionary
>>
>>        - we could replace Smalltalk
>>                by Smalltalk globals
>>
>>        - deprecate the Smalltalk associationAt:.at:...and others
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Yes. This is a logical step, which should follow the initial
> refactoring, to slowly separate concerns and
> create a clean and nice protocols.
>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project