pharo.st should be a permanent domain, I think

> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful
>> (and it has a .st!)
>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I
>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is
>> easily doable with an apache configuration.
>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this,
>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough,
>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Esteban
>>

> -1
>
> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian  
>
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
>
>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful
>>> (and it has a .st!)
>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I
>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is
>>> easily doable with an apache configuration.
>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this,
>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough,
>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Esteban
>>>
>
>

> I agree with Adrian
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>
> Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
>> -1
>>
>> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian  
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
>>
>>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful
>>>> (and it has a .st!)
>>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I
>>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is
>>>> easily doable with an apache configuration.
>>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this,
>>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough,
>>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Esteban
>>>>
>>
>>
>

> +1
>
> Doru
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> I agree with Adrian
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian  
>>>
>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
>>>
>>>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful
>>>>> (and it has a .st!)
>>>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I
>>>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is
>>>>> easily doable with an apache configuration.
>>>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this,
>>>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough,
>>>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Esteban
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Yesterday is a fact.
> Tomorrow is a possibility.
> Today is a challenge."
>
>
>
>

> best,
> Esteban
>
>
> El 31/01/2011, a las 6:36p.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Adrian
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Adrian
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful
>>>>>> (and it has a .st!)
>>>>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I
>>>>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is
>>>>>> easily doable with an apache configuration.
>>>>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this,
>>>>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough,
>>>>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Esteban
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Yesterday is a fact.
>> Tomorrow is a possibility.
>> Today is a challenge."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>