[pharo3 issues] down to 17 issues

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[pharo3 issues] down to 17 issues

Marcus Denker-4
Hi,

We are down to 17 open issues that are tagged “must fix” or higher:

        https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/64/3-0-TODO

two of those have code that is in need of review.

        Marcus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [pharo3 issues] down to 17 issues

MartinW
When i add a new bug to the issue tracker it is automatically tagged as "fix if time". Am i supposed to change this label to higher priority if i think it's appropriate - or is someone reviewing new entered bugs and assigning priorities to them?
Anyway here's the bug: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13175/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [pharo3 issues] down to 17 issues

Marcus Denker-4

On 04 Apr 2014, at 18:22, MartinW <[hidden email]> wrote:

> When i add a new bug to the issue tracker it is automatically tagged as "fix
> if time". Am i supposed to change this label to higher priority if i think
> it's appropriate -

Yes!

> or is someone reviewing new entered bugs and assigning
> priorities to them?

That too, but there is no automatism. People look at the tracker and
check and change/sort, and over time some consensus is found what
status an issue should have.

(it would be nice to have more people looking at the tracker from time to
time to help with this)

> Anyway here's the bug: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13175/
>

I put it higher so we do not forget to merge it withthe other duplicated reports.

        Marcus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [pharo3 issues] down to 17 issues

Ben Coman
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
Marcus Denker wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are down to 17 open issues that are tagged “must fix” or higher:
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/64/3-0-TODO
>
> two of those have code that is in need of review.
>
> Marcus
>
>  
That is really great Marcus. Thanks for your efforts and those of the
other integrators.
cheers -ben