Hi,
In the latest moose image ConfigurationOfMagritteGlamourForPharo40 hides the latest versions for some packages. For example it loads Glamour-Morphic-Renderer.issue_1126-SeanDeNigris.325 instead of the latest version Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-MarcusDenker.326. Did something changed these days? Cheers, Andrei _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi, It seems that the configuration of Magritte3 defines a dependency to MagritteGlamourForPharo40 with the version stable. MagritteGlamourForPharo40 stable version uses <packagename>.325. A solution is either to use the development version in Magritte3 or to release a new version in MagritteGlamourForPharo40 which will use <packagename>.326. Cheers, Vincent De : [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
De la part de Andrei Chis Hi, In the latest moose image ConfigurationOfMagritteGlamourForPharo40 hides the latest versions for some packages. For example it loads Glamour-Morphic-Renderer.issue_1126-SeanDeNigris.325 instead of the latest version Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-MarcusDenker.326. Did something changed these days? Cheers, Andrei Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Andrei Chis
Sorry for the confusion. The only purpose of this configuration is to ease the pain of Moose and Pharo both evolving rapidly and independently. The idea was to have some post-Pharo-40 Moose enhancements available in Pharo 40, specifically because they were needed for some Magritte enhancements I did. In Pharo 5.0, there should be no need to load this config because we can just integrate the Moose enhancements. Although, since a) some things, like the Issue 1126 you mentioned are WIP, and b) I'm not yet using Pharo 5.0, maybe I'm missing something...
Cheers,
Sean |
Hi Sean,
I don't understand at all why that needs a separate configuration. Stephan On 10-10-15 16:43, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Andrei Chis wrote >> In the latest moose image ConfigurationOfMagritteGlamourForPharo40 hides >> the latest versions for some packages. > Sorry for the confusion. The only purpose of this configuration is to ease > the pain of Moose and Pharo both evolving rapidly and independently. The > idea was to have some post-Pharo-40 Moose enhancements available in Pharo > 40, specifically because they were needed for some Magritte enhancements I > did. In Pharo 5.0, there should be no need to load this config because we > can just integrate the Moose enhancements. Although, since a) some things, > like the Issue 1126 you mentioned are WIP, and b) I'm not yet using Pharo > 5.0, maybe I'm missing something... > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/pharo5-and-ConfigurationOfMagritteGlamourForPharo40-tp4854773p4854878.html > Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Let's see if this helps
Name: ConfigurationOfMagritte3-StephanEggermont.117 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 October 2015, 5:56:07.098168 pm UUID: e61105b7-4521-4428-9881-795f10251beb Ancestors: ConfigurationOfMagritte3-SeanDeNigris.116 In place change: block with MagritteGlamourForPharo40 only for Pharo 4. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Stephan Eggermont-3
IIRC it was because Moose beta parallels Pharo beta, so latest Moose changes are (potentially) incompatible with Pharo 4.0.
Cheers,
Sean |
On 10-10-15 19:34, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Stephan Eggermont wrote >> I don't understand at all why that needs a separate configuration. > IIRC it was because Moose beta parallels Pharo beta, so latest Moose changes > are (potentially) incompatible with Pharo 4.0. So why does that need a separate configuration? Stephan _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Administrator
|
Maybe it doesn't. I remember trying to update the existing configurations, but there were at least three or four configs involved (e.g. Glamour, GlamourCore, GT-Xyz, etc.), some of which had already created new Pharo-5.0-specific versions. For one thing, it quickly seemed too complex for me, and for another, I wasn't sure e.g. if x.x.x was released with Pharo 4.0, and x.x.(x+1) was Pharo 5.0-specific, what I would call the newer 4.0-specific one. If someone can figure out how to do it better, I'm not attached to this method. It was primarily to get on with my own work in Pharo 4.0.
Cheers,
Sean |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |