Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

pharo9.x?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

3 messages Options

ducasse

pharo9.x?

Hi

I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we should not
add pharo9.x to a list somewhere.

S.

gcotelli

Re: pharo9.x?

We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well:

https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.package/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.class/instance/setUpPharo5AndGreaterPackages..st

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we should not
add pharo9.x to a list somewhere.

S.

ducasse

Re: pharo9.x?

Thanks.

For me I cannot get the phar9.x branch loading. I will investigate if I can understand what is the problem

aselineOfCozy >> baseline: spec [
	<baseline>


	spec for: #'pharo8.x'
	do: [
	spec package: 'CozyCommon'.
	spec package: 'CozyPharo8' with: [ spec requires: #('CozyCommon') ]
	].

	spec for: #'pharo9.x'
	do: [
	spec package: 'CozyCommon'.
	spec package: 'CozyIceberg'.
	spec package: 'CozyTheme'.
	spec package: 'CozyPharo9' with: [ spec requires: #('CozyCommon') ]
	].
	]

On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:50, Gabriel Cotelli <[hidden email]> wrote:

We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well:

https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.package/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.class/instance/setUpPharo5AndGreaterPackages..st

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi

I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we should not
add pharo9.x to a list somewhere.

S.