pillar latex and code listings

I look at the pdf for the update PBE and the references to code example don't

work (just show ??, it works for figures).

The code in the code example isn't highlight and

does't have a dark background (as it is in the html output).

On 7 November 2016 at 23:03, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

I look at the pdf for the update PBE and the references to code example don't

work (just show ??, it works for figures).

Could be that the reference or label simply don't match…

 

The code in the code example isn't highlight and

does't have a dark background (as it is in the html output).

Don't expect PDF and HTML to look the same.

Pillar does its job at a semantic level, not at form level. Both have their own independent way of styling stuff. For LaTeX it relies on a specific document class setup, including some macros to have a layer of decoupling between pillar's output and what some packages offer. The listing environment you're mentioning is an example; I haven't looked at pre-EnterprisePharo books in a while, but it should indeed just be defined as an alias to the lstlisting provided by listings.sty.

BTW I'd recommend migrating the books to the EnterprisePharo layout… but that requires being somehow versed in the dark arts of LaTeX and ready to spend a couple days checking for problems and matching format conventions…

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

2016-11-07 23:47 GMT+01:00 Damien Pollet <[hidden email]>:

On 7 November 2016 at 23:03, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

I look at the pdf for the update PBE and the references to code example don't

work (just show ??, it works for figures).

Could be that the reference or label simply don't match…

But it is the same source that works for the html output.

 

 

The code in the code example isn't highlight and

does't have a dark background (as it is in the html output).

Don't expect PDF and HTML to look the same.

Yes, but the latext template at least looks like the listing for smalltalk language at least should recognize some syntax words (self/super/...)

 

Pillar does its job at a semantic level, not at form level. Both have their own independent way of styling stuff. For LaTeX it relies on a specific document class setup, including some macros to have a layer of decoupling between pillar's output and what some packages offer. The listing environment you're mentioning is an example; I haven't looked at pre-EnterprisePharo books in a while, but it should indeed just be defined as an alias to the lstlisting provided by listings.sty.

OK, I 'll check this.

 

BTW I'd recommend migrating the books to the EnterprisePharo layout… but that requires being somehow versed in the dark arts of LaTeX and ready to spend a couple days checking for problems and matching format conventions…

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

On 7 November 2016 at 23:03, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

I look at the pdf for the update PBE and the references to code example don't

work (just show ??, it works for figures).

Could be that the reference or label simply don't match…

 

The code in the code example isn't highlight and

does't have a dark background (as it is in the html output).

Don't expect PDF and HTML to look the same. Pillar does its job at a semantic level, not at form level. Both have their own independent way of styling stuff. For LaTeX it relies on a specific document class setup, including some macros to have a layer of decoupling between pillar's output and what some packages offer. The listing environment you're mentioning is an example; I haven't looked at pre-EnterprisePharo books in a while, but it should indeed just be defined as an alias to the lstlisting provided by listings.sty.

BTW I'd recommend migrating the books to the EnterprisePharo layout… but that requires being somehow versed in the dark arts of LaTeX and ready to spend a couple days checking for problems and matching format conventions…

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

Hi Damien, I don't see how the layout from the EnterprisePharo could do labeled listings we could ref from the text. May it be that this is just not possible ?

On 13 November 2016 at 16:23, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Damien, I don't see how the layout from the EnterprisePharo could do labeled listings we could ref from the text. May it be that this is just not possible ?

I recall we discussed choices with the other Damien, and that there were constraints due to listings.sty, but I think that's possible. I'd have to have a look at the code, though, because it's very well possible that we decided on a workaround instead.

Can you catch me on Slack sometime this week, or open an issue on https://github.com/cdlm/sbabook if not?

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

I finally remembered to have a quick look… there is one named and referenced script in the Pillar chapter in EnterprisePharo. Look for occurrences of "my script"

On 13 November 2016 at 22:53, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

2016-11-13 22:16 GMT+01:00 Damien Pollet <[hidden email]>:

On 13 November 2016 at 16:23, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Damien, I don't see how the layout from the EnterprisePharo could do labeled listings we could ref from the text. May it be that this is just not possible ?

I recall we discussed choices with the other Damien, and that there were constraints due to listings.sty, but I think that's possible. I'd have to have a look at the code, though, because it's very well possible that we decided on a workaround instead.

Can you catch me on Slack sometime this week, or open an issue on https://github.com/cdlm/sbabook if not?

Ok, thanks.

 

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

 

--

Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet