On 31.01.2016, at 17:10, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]
>> On 31 Jan 2016, at 16:56, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]
>> On 31-01-16 11:23, Johan Brichau wrote:
>>> Hi Stephan,
>>> Is it a good idea to tag bleedingEdge and development on Pharo 1 and 2 such that it’s a fixed release 3.1 ?
>>> Sounds confusing to me for people, no?
>> Yes, and I presume it is better than non-running code?
>> Should I add a "no development and bleedingEdge anymore on Pharo 1 and 2"?
> Can we make Metacello say there is no development nor bleedingEdge versions on those platforms ?
> I seem to remember there was a way to do that but my mind might play tricks on me…
you can use the symbolic name #broken , IIRC:
spec for: #'pharo1.x' version: #broken.
> seaside-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
seaside-dev mailing list