preparing the 4.0 release

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: preparing the 4.0 release

Tudor Girba
Ok, I updated the ConfigurationOfMoose and everything looks Ok.

Cheers,
Doru

On 21 May 2010, at 21:49, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> Pick ConfigurationOfXMLSupport from XMLSupport.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 21 May 2010, at 14:25, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Thanks. I will then remove the Opax from the ConfigurationOfMoose.
>>
>> Just a question, which ConfigurationOfXMLParser should we depend  
>> on? The one from the XMLSupport repository, or the one from the  
>> MetacelloRepository. I would prefer the one from the XMLSupport  
>> repository.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 May 2010, at 19:11, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> Opax is now in.
>>> I added a small method called readme in OPOpaxTest. It says what  
>>> Opax is for.
>>>
>>> I could not understand the class OPOpaxHandlerTestClass.
>>> This class is part of a test scenario. But I cannot easily see a  
>>> justification of the method override in it. Maybe the class could  
>>> be documented?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 May 2010, at 07:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Alex, have you finished to include OPAX ?
>>>>> Do you need help ?
>>>>
>>>> I planned to do this before Sunday. And it has nothing to do with  
>>>> lazyness, believe me
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there something to do for the release ?
>>>>> With Cyrille, we can do this afternoon the Metacello  
>>>>> configuration for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 16, 2010, at 23:12 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was wondering, should OPAX be kept separated from XMLSupport?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would be happy if OPAX would get integrated into XMLSupport.  
>>>>>>> I think it belongs there. There are a number of things that  
>>>>>>> could be added (such as better matching for tags, or various  
>>>>>>> default traversals), but I think even as simple as it  
>>>>>>> currently is, it still adds to the SAX protocol.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok. I will include OPAX in XMLSupport. Just give me a few days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Jannik Laval
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Presenting is storytelling."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
12