problems with 12119 and 12120

> I was trying to clean a bit MethodReference and now I broke the merge in Monticello.
> Now I get all the method with revision changed
>
> So what do we do?
>
> The changes were to help the integration of the new recentMessages changes
>
> 1- rollback because I do not have the time to dive into this part of the system.
> We need a better and cleaner infrastructure with a real declarative code model and not a hack like methodReference and tweak it to get
> comments and class definition on it. I hate that we have so lousy and brittle foundation
>
> 2- let it and try to understand why it breaks. But I have no time (now this stuff will stay in my mind until I check -grgrg).
>
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> HI guys
>
> to lower my stress I removed from the update stream the items related to my MethodReference changes.
> so please update from 12016
> Benjamin I will try to find what is the problem.
>
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> I was trying to clean a bit MethodReference and now I broke the merge in Monticello.
>> Now I get all the method with revision changed
>>
>> So what do we do?
>>
>> The changes were to help the integration of the new recentMessages changes
>>
>> 1- rollback because I do not have the time to dive into this part of the system.
>> We need a better and cleaner infrastructure with a real declarative code model and not a hack like methodReference and tweak it to get
>> comments and class definition on it. I hate that we have so lousy and brittle foundation
>>
>> 2- let it and try to understand why it breaks. But I have no time (now this stuff will stay in my mind until I check -grgrg).
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> I'm cleaning the scriptloader and update list because there were intertwined fixes.
> I will redo them in order.
> We need a scriptable source.
>
> Stef
>
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> HI guys
>>
>> to lower my stress I removed from the update stream the items related to my MethodReference changes.
>> so please update from 12016
>> Benjamin I will try to find what is the problem.
>>
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to clean a bit MethodReference and now I broke the merge in Monticello.
>>> Now I get all the method with revision changed
>>>
>>> So what do we do?
>>>
>>> The changes were to help the integration of the new recentMessages changes
>>>
>>> 1- rollback because I do not have the time to dive into this part of the system.
>>> We need a better and cleaner infrastructure with a real declarative code model and not a hack like methodReference and tweak it to get
>>> comments and class definition on it. I hate that we have so lousy and brittle foundation
>>>
>>> 2- let it and try to understand why it breaks. But I have no time (now this stuff will stay in my mind until I check -grgrg).
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project