profiling an Amber application?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

profiling an Amber application?

abergel
Hi!

Just wondering whether someone tried this. Firebug?

Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: profiling an Amber application?

Herby Vojčík
I used Chrome profiler to spot hot spots (in boot.js) and saw no
problem. It's harder to see what smalltalk method is called, since they
are not named and always presented as "Smalltalk.method.fn" or so, so
you must click one by one to find which one it is (for example, Number
 >> = took most of the time in one of my scenarios, which in fact
prompted me to create better compiler than can do better local returns).

Herby

Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just wondering whether someone tried this. Firebug?
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: profiling an Amber application?

abergel
Interesting.
Thanks for the feedback!

Alexandre


On Jun 3, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Herby Vojčík wrote:

> I used Chrome profiler to spot hot spots (in boot.js) and saw no problem. It's harder to see what smalltalk method is called, since they are not named and always presented as "Smalltalk.method.fn" or so, so you must click one by one to find which one it is (for example, Number >> = took most of the time in one of my scenarios, which in fact prompted me to create better compiler than can do better local returns).
>
> Herby
>
> Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Just wondering whether someone tried this. Firebug?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.