On May 8, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Tudor Girba <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, it's not. Just like polymetric views, it is a pattern of visualization.
I'm still do not see why this is different from a radial layout. but this is not important.
>
> But, having a solid distribution map package would be great. Who wants to work on this?
We started to use contractor to compact labels. But my intuition is that there are many parameters that are missing.
Stef
>
> Doru
>
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I would like to see how I can avoid to get confused.
>>
>> I would like to see distribution maps improved and get some variations. Now I wonder
>> is distribution maps a layout?
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Innovation comes in the least expected form.
> That is, if it is expected, it already happened."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Locked
