roassal in the world menu
Locked
 
|
Hi,
Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). Alex, what do you say? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Yes, I can move the default roassal easel accessible from the Tools menu. I've just committed.
Another point. What is the language supported by the glamour roassal easel? Currently, it uses the low API. A valid script is: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | b | b := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: view. b nodes: (1 to: 20). b applyLayout. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? Cheers, Alexandre On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. > > In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. > > In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). > > Alex, what do you say? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Yesterday is a fact. > Tomorrow is a possibility. > Today is a challenge." > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi,
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Yes, I can move the default roassal easel accessible from the Tools menu. I've just committed. Great, thanks. > Another point. > What is the language supported by the glamour roassal easel? Currently, it uses the low API. A valid script is: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > | b | > b := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: view. > b nodes: (1 to: 20). > b applyLayout. > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Indeed, this is the current case. > shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? Cheers, Doru > Cheers, > Alexandre > > On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >> >> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >> >> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >> >> Alex, what do you say? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Yesterday is a fact. >> Tomorrow is a possibility. >> Today is a challenge." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
>> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView?
> > I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. > > Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView? Alexandre > > > >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>> >>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>> >>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>> >>> Alex, what do you say? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>> Today is a challenge." >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. > But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi,
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? >> >> I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. >> >> Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? > > Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView? How about view and rawView? Doru > Alexandre > >> >> >> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>>> >>>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>>> >>>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>>> >>>> Alex, what do you say? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>>> Today is a challenge." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. >> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing should have the right to be different." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Just a note:
When we accept something in the Easel, we tell the view variable to render. If we get two variables, we need to get them to affect the same low level model, such that we can tell the rawView to render. This means that the ROMondrianViewBuilder should be changed to offer a reference to the underlying ROView. Doru On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:37, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>>> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? >>> >>> I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. >>> >>> Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? >> >> Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView? > > How about view and rawView? > > Doru > > >> Alexandre >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>>>> >>>>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>>>> >>>>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>>>> >>>>> Alex, what do you say? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>>>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>>>> Today is a challenge." >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. >>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing should have the right to be different." > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com Innovation comes in least expected form. That is, if it is expected, it already happened. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Yep, easy:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. rawView := view container. Here is an example: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Preambule. It includes the initialization. " | view rawView | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. rawView := view container. "enter your script below" "-------------" "-------------" rawView add: ROElement sprite. view nodes: (1 to: 20). "-------------" "-------------" "Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization" ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view. view open -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cheers, Alexandre On Jun 2, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Just a note: > When we accept something in the Easel, we tell the view variable to render. > > If we get two variables, we need to get them to affect the same low level model, such that we can tell the rawView to render. This means that the ROMondrianViewBuilder should be changed to offer a reference to the underlying ROView. > > Doru > > > On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:37, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>>>> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? >>>> >>>> I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. >>>> >>>> Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? >>> >>> Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView? >> >> How about view and rawView? >> >> Doru >> >> >>> Alexandre >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>>>>> >>>>>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex, what do you say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Doru >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>>> >>>>>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>>>>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>>>>> Today is a challenge." >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. >>>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > Innovation comes in least expected form. > That is, if it is expected, it already happened. > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Excellent. In this case, we actually do not even need two variables :). We just start from the MondrianViewBuilder and if someone wants the raw one, it can just access it from there.
Doru On 4 Jun 2012, at 20:06, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Yep, easy: > > view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. > rawView := view container. > > Here is an example: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > "Preambule. It includes the initialization. " > | view rawView | > view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. > rawView := view container. > "enter your script below" > "-------------" > "-------------" > > rawView add: ROElement sprite. > view nodes: (1 to: 20). > > "-------------" > "-------------" > "Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization" > ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view. > view open > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On Jun 2, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Just a note: >> When we accept something in the Easel, we tell the view variable to render. >> >> If we get two variables, we need to get them to affect the same low level model, such that we can tell the rawView to render. This means that the ROMondrianViewBuilder should be changed to offer a reference to the underlying ROView. >> >> Doru >> >> >> On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:37, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>>>> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? >>>>> >>>>> I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels. >>>>> >>>>> Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel? >>>> >>>> Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView? >>> >>> How about view and rawView? >>> >>> Doru >>> >>> >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex, what do you say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Doru >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>>>>>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>>>>>> Today is a challenge." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. >>>>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> Innovation comes in least expected form. >> That is, if it is expected, it already happened. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Value is always contextual." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by abergel
Following up from a while a go...
In yesterday's Moose 4.7 I see that Roassal Easel is at the top of the Tools menu - right where I always go to get the Finder. Perhaps Roassal Easel could be moved down next to Modrian Easel ? cheer -ben Alexandre Bergel wrote: Yes, I can move the default roassal easel accessible from the Tools menu. I've just committed. Another point. What is the language supported by the glamour roassal easel? Currently, it uses the low API. A valid script is: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | b | b := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: view. b nodes: (1 to: 20). b applyLayout. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? Cheers, Alexandre On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:Hi, Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). Alex, what do you say? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
I have now added it below the Finder menu.
I actually like to have it at the top of the menu. Can someone else give his opinion. Cheers, Alexandre On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Ben Coman wrote: > Following up from a while a go... > > In yesterday's Moose 4.7 I see that Roassal Easel is at the top of the Tools menu - right where I always go to get the Finder. > Perhaps Roassal Easel could be moved down next to Modrian Easel ? > > cheer -ben > > > Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> Yes, I can move the default roassal easel accessible from the Tools menu. I've just committed. >> >> Another point. >> What is the language supported by the glamour roassal easel? Currently, it uses the low API. A valid script is: >> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> | b | >> b := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: view. >> b nodes: (1 to: 20). >> b applyLayout. >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> >> shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView? >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel. >>> >>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu. >>> >>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does). >>> >>> Alex, what do you say? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> >>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>> Today is a challenge." >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
You would have got used to it there.
I doubly appreciate the change then. Alexandre Bergel wrote: I have now added it below the Finder menu. I actually like to have it at the top of the menu. Can someone else give his opinion. Cheers, Alexandre On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Ben Coman wrote: _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |