robust editors

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

robust editors

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

As you might know we have a couple of dedicated editors for:
- Glamour
- Roassal
- EyeSee, and
- Mondrian

Until now, if you had certain errors in the code, the whole editor would be rendered useless. I finally fixed this, and now the editors should be robust: if you have an error in the code (for example, syntax problem), you get a default rendering that exhibits the problem (see attachments).

If you happen to find any other problems with the editors, please let me know.

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing should have the right to be different."



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robust editors

Ben Coman
That is great.  I'm not in a position to try it out yet, so an uniformed question... Can you then open a debugger on the error?

cheers -ben

Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,

As you might know we have a couple of dedicated editors for:
- Glamour
- Roassal
- EyeSee, and
- Mondrian

Until now, if you had certain errors in the code, the whole editor would be 
rendered useless. I finally fixed this, and now the editors should be robust: if 
you have an error in the code (for example, syntax problem), you get a default 
rendering that exhibits the problem (see attachments).

If you happen to find any other problems with the editors, please let me know.

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>

"Every thing should have the right to be different."


  

_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robust editors

abergel
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
This is an excellent piece of news
I have been waiting for this for a long long time

Thanks Doru!
Alexandre


On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As you might know we have a couple of dedicated editors for:
> - Glamour
> - Roassal
> - EyeSee, and
> - Mondrian
>
> Until now, if you had certain errors in the code, the whole editor would be rendered useless. I finally fixed this, and now the editors should be robust: if you have an error in the code (for example, syntax problem), you get a default rendering that exhibits the problem (see attachments).
>
> If you happen to find any other problems with the editors, please let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>
>
> <Glamour Editor.png><Roassal Easel.png>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev