rubric performace
Locked
 
|
Hi,
I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. I opened the file in several other editors: - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) How did Rubric perform: - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: --- Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; load. [ contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). (RubLipsumBasicExample windowWithScrolledText: ( RubLipsumBasicExample new string: contents; newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) openInWorld ] timeToRun --- Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "What we can governs what we wish." |
|
|
> Hi, > > I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. > > I opened the file in several other editors: > - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) thanks doru this is really interesting. > How did Rubric perform: > - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly > - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( > > In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. I think that with more ironing and optimisation it will only get better! Thanks synectique http://www.synectique.eu for sponsoring the work of Alain and releasing it MIT. > > If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: > > --- > Gofer new > smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; > package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; > load. > > [ > contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). > (RubLipsumBasicExample > windowWithScrolledText: ( > RubLipsumBasicExample new > string: contents; > newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) > openInWorld > ] timeToRun > --- > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
On 25 April 2013 00:03, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. > > I opened the file in several other editors: > - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) > > How did Rubric perform: > - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly > - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( > > In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. > > If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: > > --- > Gofer new > smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; > package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; > load. > > [ > contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). > (RubLipsumBasicExample > windowWithScrolledText: ( > RubLipsumBasicExample new > string: contents; > newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) > openInWorld > ] timeToRun > --- > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko. |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Thanx for benchmarking Rubric. Alain, is doing great work and I'll integrate in Glamour for a demo.
usman On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
doru can you reproduce your crash?
Because igor asked and I did not see your answer. Stef On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. > > I opened the file in several other editors: > - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly > - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) > > How did Rubric perform: > - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly > - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( > > In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. > > If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: > > --- > Gofer new > smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; > package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; > load. > > [ > contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). > (RubLipsumBasicExample > windowWithScrolledText: ( > RubLipsumBasicExample new > string: contents; > newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) > openInWorld > ] timeToRun > --- > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > |
|
|
Hi,
I tried but could not :(. I tried multiple times to load the file and go around the "out of memory" limitation and then at some random point, Pharo crashed. I was on Mac when I did the experiment. If I get more info I will let you know. Doru On Apr 29, 2013, at 8:44 PM, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > doru can you reproduce your crash? > Because igor asked and I did not see your answer. > > Stef > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. >> >> I opened the file in several other editors: >> - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly >> - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly >> - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) >> >> How did Rubric perform: >> - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly >> - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( >> >> In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. >> >> If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: >> >> --- >> Gofer new >> smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; >> package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; >> load. >> >> [ >> contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). >> (RubLipsumBasicExample >> windowWithScrolledText: ( >> RubLipsumBasicExample new >> string: contents; >> newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) >> openInWorld >> ] timeToRun >> --- >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "What we can governs what we wish." >> >> >> >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." |
|
|
tx!
On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried but could not :(. I tried multiple times to load the file and go around the "out of memory" limitation and then at some random point, Pharo crashed. I was on Mac when I did the experiment. If I get more info I will let you know. > > Doru > > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 8:44 PM, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> doru can you reproduce your crash? >> Because igor asked and I did not see your answer. >> >> Stef >> >> On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I did a little experiment to check the performance of Rubric when dealing with large content. And by large, I mean 45 MB or about 15 million lines of text. >>> >>> I opened the file in several other editors: >>> - TextMate: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly >>> - Sublime Text 2: 10s + the text is wrapped and can be browsed smoothly >>> - Eclipse: 5s + browsing is very slow (so it is basically useless) >>> >>> How did Rubric perform: >>> - When opened with unwrapped lines: 33s + the text can be browsed smoothly >>> - When opened with wrapped lines -> Pharo crashed :( >>> >>> In any case, I think being 3 times slower (even if without wrapping) than TextMate is highly exciting. Great job Alain. >>> >>> If you want to reproduce the experiment, here is the Smalltalk snippet I used: >>> >>> --- >>> Gofer new >>> smalltalkhubUser: 'AlainPlantec' project: 'Rubric'; >>> package: 'Rubric-AlainPlantec.26'; >>> load. >>> >>> [ >>> contents := ((FileSystem disk workingDirectory / 'src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'output.mse') readStreamDo: #contents). >>> (RubLipsumBasicExample >>> windowWithScrolledText: ( >>> RubLipsumBasicExample new >>> string: contents; >>> newScrolledTextNotWrapped)) >>> openInWorld >>> ] timeToRun >>> --- >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "What we can governs what we wish." >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." > > > > |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |