I like the idea that a build-server determines that automatically even
better. :)
Cheers,
Henry
On 20.10.2009 21:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> I like the idea that people could contribute to a working configuration.
>
> Stef
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:40 PM, keith wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 Oct 2009, at 20:30, keith wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:08, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yeap
>>>> this is what I mean with Universes.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
>>>>> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Damien I would really like to see Universes coming back. Do we
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> any chance getting it back?
>>>>>>
>>>>> No, not in the sense of what was the previous Universes system.
>>>>> What
>>>>> we really want:
>>>>>
>>>>> - a repository on SqueakSource
>>>>> - a package in that repository with a single class
>>>>> - this class defines one method per package we support
>>>>> - each method as a small script to load the package (best thing for
>>>>> the method would be to load the loader of the particular package
>>>>> and
>>>>> launch it)
>>>>>
>>> You just described Sake/Packages and you know it.
>>>
>>> Keith
>>>
>> sake/packages loading seaside 3.0 AND unloading
>>
>>
http://www.vimeo.com/groups/squeak/videos/5434330>>
>> Keith
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project