shortcut for defining edges

> Hi!
>
> For the last two years I have been writing code like:
>  view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 } from: #key to: #value.
>
> I have checked your code but I am wondering whether I am the only one
>
> I think it would be cool to be able to write:
>  view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 }
>
> Does it make sense?
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

> Hi,
>
> I would argue strongly against it, because you are overriding too much the meaning of #edges:. Instead, I would suggest adding a new selector called #edgesFromAssociations:.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> On 20 Jan 2011, at 14:33, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> For the last two years I have been writing code like:
>> view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 } from: #key to: #value.
>>
>> I have checked your code but I am wondering whether I am the only one
>>
>> I think it would be cool to be able to write:
>> view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 }
>>
>> Does it make sense?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

>
>
>
> On 20 Jan 2011, at 14:33, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> For the last two years I have been writing code like:
>> view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 } from: #key to: #value.
>>
>> I have checked your code but I am wondering whether I am the only one
>>
>> I think it would be cool to be able to write:
>> view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 }
>>
>> Does it make sense?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev