Hi Avi,
While backporting some code from VW to Squeak, I found strange that something that works fine in VW, does not work in Squeak : renderContentOn: html | temp | html form: [html textInputWithCallback: [:v | temp := v]. html submitButtonWithAction: [self inform: 'Hello ', temp]]. In VW, the value of "temp", computed by the first callback, is available to the second callback. In Squeak, the value is not available, the only solution I found was to make "temp" an i-var. The same difference can be observed with the canvas api. Do you think anything could be done to have Seaside behave in Squeak like in VW. Michel. _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On 2/6/06, Bany, Michel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Do you think anything could be done to have Seaside behave in Squeak > like in VW. > As soon as Squeak has real closures integrated (3.9 should have the closure compiler), that stuff should work. I think Seaside sends #fixTemps here and there to blocks under Squeak (or something similar is going on, related to blocks not being closures in Squeak) _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On 06.02.2006, at 13:29, Cees De Groot wrote: > On 2/6/06, Bany, Michel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Do you think anything could be done to have Seaside behave in Squeak >> like in VW. >> > As soon as Squeak has real closures integrated (3.9 should have the > closure compiler) Not really... 3.9 will have the closure runtime, the compiler will be a loadable module for those that need it. (switching a compiler is something that takes some care.. and there are some smaller and larger glitches that need to be sorted out). Marcus _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On 2/6/06, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Not really... 3.9 will have the closure runtime, the compiler will be > a loadable module for those that need it. > Good enough :) _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Bany, Michel
Hi Michel,
Using a state holder stored in the temp should work too. Like that you would not need an i-var. Adrian On Feb 6, 2006, at 13:16 , Bany, Michel wrote: > Hi Avi, > > While backporting some code from VW to Squeak, I found strange that > something that works fine in VW, does not work in Squeak : > > renderContentOn: html > | temp | > html form: > [html textInputWithCallback: > [:v | temp := v]. > html submitButtonWithAction: > [self inform: 'Hello ', temp]]. > > In VW, the value of "temp", computed by the first callback, is > available > to the second callback. In Squeak, the value is not available, the > only > solution I found was to make "temp" an i-var. > > The same difference can be observed with the canvas api. > > Do you think anything could be done to have Seaside behave in Squeak > like > in VW. > > Michel. > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Bany, Michel
> Using a state holder stored in the temp should work too. Like
> that you would not need an i-var. > > Adrian > Hi Adrian, Actually any object will do, like a ValueHolder, a collection, even a Customer or whatever, but with this hack the code may get somewhat bizarre. Still, the real issue is portability from VW to Squeak :-( Michel. _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Feb 6, 2006, at 15:01 , Bany, Michel wrote: >> Using a state holder stored in the temp should work too. Like >> that you would not need an i-var. >> >> Adrian >> > > Hi Adrian, > Actually any object will do, like a ValueHolder, a collection, yes sure, I meant value holder. > even a Customer or whatever, but with this hack the code may > get somewhat bizarre. indeed - but maybe still better than using an instance variable... > Still, the real issue is portability from VW to Squeak :-( yes, it would be nice to get these kind of things fixed in Squeak. Adrian > > Michel. > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |