Login  Register

[Moose-dev] Re: ConfigurationOfGlamour: Glamour and Mondrian decoupling

Posted by Tudor Girba on Jan 26, 2010; 1:14pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Moose-dev-retrieve-Memory-class-in-CAnalyzer-tp1310788p1310793.html

Hi,

I created an issue:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=310

Cheers,
Doru


On 26 Jan 2010, at 09:12, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi Fernando,
>
> That is not a bad idea, but it will probably take a while until I do  
> it because it also implies repackaging :).
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 25 Jan 2010, at 13:36, Fernando olivero wrote:
>
>> Tudor i think ConfigurationOfGlamour should provide groups for  
>> decoupling Glamour installation and Mondrian installation.
>>
>> Not everybody using scriptable browsers want to use Mondrian panes.
>>
>> In summary, In the default group leave out Mondrian packages  
>> dependencies and provide a metacello group for loading Glamour
>> +Mondrian explicitly.
>>
>> Pros:  Faster installation time and decoupling Glamour  from  
>> Mondrian.
>>
>> Cons: people not familiar with Metacello could get puzzled, but for  
>> this you could provide convenience method in  
>> ConfigurationOfGlamour  class ( like we did in ConfigurationOfAlien).
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Fernando
>>
>>
>>
>> pd: In the method you provide some groups already.
>>
>> baseline20beta3: spec
>> ...
>> spec group: 'Tests' with: #(
>> 'Glamour-Tests'
>> 'Glamour-Examples'
>> 'Glamour-Test-Morphic').
>> ....
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair,
> you will end up with a messy haircut."
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot  
be done."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev