> uses:, and if not add it. Sounds like simple metaprogramming ...
Although not perfect, it is easy and efficient.
>
> On 28 Apr 2010, at 01:56, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> so far (and similarly to instance variable) you cannot with the
>> current definition syntax
>> declare a trait (add instance) to a class from a package that does
>> not define the class.
>> You can do that in the initialize of a class loaded in a package
>> but there is no think like
>>
>> MyClass addInstanceVariable: 'x'
>> MyOtherClass addTrait:
>>
>> at the similar syntax level than
>>
>>> FAMIXScopingEntity subclass: #FAMIXNamespace
>>> uses: TAMStructuralZoom
>>> instanceVariableNames: ''
>>> classVariableNames: ''
>>> poolDictionaries: ''
>>> category: 'Famix-Core'
>>
>> this is why one day packages will have to be a bit better supported
>> and more important
>> we will have fix the "semantics" of changeset to be something than
>> a simple side effect of 'oh this is easy' just save the class def
>> and the method definition (because a class is a complex object).
>
> --
> Johan Fabry
>
[hidden email] -
http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users