Posted by
Tudor Girba on
May 05, 2010; 8:22am
URL: https://forum.world.st/distribution-map-tp2125175p2130608.html
Hi,
MondrianPaintings holds Mondrian views which are typically 2-3 methods
each. Distribution Map, with all the Wizard and other computations is
more than that, so I think it deserves a package on its own :)
Actually, I do not like categories :). I prefer to have packages for
everything.
Cheers,
Doru
On 4 May 2010, at 16:38, Simon Denier wrote:
>
> On 4 mai 2010, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Cyrille,
>>
>> I have a bit of feedback for Distribution Map:
>>
>> - The computation from Distribution Map Wizard is too expensive
>> because you iterate over the meta elements and for each of them you
>> go over all elements of Moose through the method
>> includesElementsOfType:
>>
>> It would be better if you would go over all cached groups and
>> decide based on that rather than traversing the entire entities
>> collection (which can be millions of objects).
>>
>> - It would be better if Distribution Map gets its own package
>> because it starts to be large
>
>
> What does large mean in this context? I mean, I don't understand the
> benefit of creating a single package for DistributionMap while all
> others are under MondrianPaintings (within their own categories)
>
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting
is the right one."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev