Posted by
Nicolas Petton on
Nov 15, 2010; 10:51am
URL: https://forum.world.st/Code-stats-Aida-vs-Seaside-vs-Iliad-tp3038588p3042852.html
Yes, Iliad needs more comments.
Now, we try to always comment classes and methods of the API. See
ILWidget, ILApplication, etc.
Internal stuff are less commented, and I agree there should be more
comments here too, but I think it's less important.
Nicolas
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 11:40 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus a écrit :
> Janko Mivšek <
[hidden email]> writes:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Code statistics extended with several graphs is now available at Google
> > Docs:
> >
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atnb1W9vuq9ndG4wbUpxNXpKQnFZRlFyQXpHclhZa2c&hl=en#gid=1> >
> > I added graphs of three distributions:
> >
> > - number of methods in classes
> > - class inheritance depth
> > - number of lines in methods
> >
> > Tests and comments section was also added.
> >
> > Aida Seaside Iliad
> > Nr of test methods 67 914 412
> > Avg tests/class 0,5 1 1,6
> >
> > % of commented methods 45% 23% 5%
> > % of commented classes 32% 39% 13%
> >
> >
> > Quite interesting results and again a lot of food for discussion!
> Indeed AIDA and Seaside need more tests and Iliad more comments ;-)
>
> Now the question is is Iliad so readable that it does not need comments
> ;-)
>
> I think discussing somethong upon such numbers is not a worthwhile
> undertaking. Too many open questions which may it feasible to "judge"
> something..
>
> Regardss
> Friedrich
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Aida mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida