> Yes, Iliad needs more comments.
>
> Now, we try to always comment classes and methods of the API. See
> ILWidget, ILApplication, etc.
>
> Internal stuff are less commented, and I agree there should be more
> comments here too, but I think it's less important.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 11:40 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus a écrit :
>> Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> writes:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Code statistics extended with several graphs is now available at Google
>>> Docs:
>>> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atnb1W9vuq9ndG4wbUpxNXpKQnFZRlFyQXpHclhZa2c&hl=en#gid=1
>>>
>>> I added graphs of three distributions:
>>>
>>>  - number of methods in classes
>>>  - class inheritance depth
>>>  - number of lines in methods
>>>
>>> Tests and comments section was also added.
>>>
>>>                           Aida  Seaside  Iliad
>>>   Nr of test methods       67     914     412
>>>   Avg tests/class         0,5      1      1,6
>>>
>>>   % of commented methods  45%     23%       5%
>>>   % of commented classes  32%     39%      13%
>>>
>>>
>>> Quite interesting results and again a lot of food for discussion!
>> Indeed AIDA and Seaside need more tests and Iliad more comments ;-)
>>
>> Now the question is is Iliad so readable that it does not need comments
>> ;-)
>>
>> I think discussing somethong upon such numbers is not a worthwhile
>> undertaking. Too many open questions which may it feasible to "judge"
>> something..
>>
>> Regardss
>> Friedrich
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aida mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida