On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
> I personally thing if we ever want to release 1.2, we need to start to be more radical.
>
> The XML package breaks the build? So let's remove it completely. Let's ship 1.2, but without
> all the packages that are problematic.
>
> Same for any other package that has a failing test.
>
> Marcus
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Still I do not understand:
>>
>> Evaluate this in an updated Pharo core 1.2:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Gofer new
>> squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
>> package: 'ConfigurationOfXMLSupport';
>> load.
>>
>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfXMLSupport) project latestVersion
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> returns 1.1.8 [ConfigurationOfXMLSupport]
>>
>> This is now broken by Otto. OK, he broke it, he has to repair it ;)
>>
>> But independent from that, the method in:
>>
>> ConfigurationOfPharo>>version12beta2:
>>
>> includes the following:
>>
>> project: 'XMLSupport' with: '1.1.6'.
>>
>> So I would have expected that for Pharo "1.2-beta2" the 1.1.6 (and not the
>> 1.1.8) of XMLSupport gets loaded and Hudson should have been green.
>>
>> Why does Metacello load the 1.1.8 when a previous project version (1.1.6)
>> is referenced?
>>
>> Dale, any comments?
>>
>> Bye
>> T.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
>> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro!
https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
>>
>
> --
> Marcus Denker --
http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>
>