Re: Glamour-Morphic-Theme package rename?
Posted by
Stéphane Ducasse on
Mar 03, 2011; 10:27am
URL: https://forum.world.st/Glamour-Morphic-Theme-package-rename-tp3332037p3333072.html
The idea is that alain would like to have only one theme but fully parametrized and that we can unify all that.
Typically orange should not be a subclass :).
Now you are probably right and I want to remove some other not working theme: Pro and a couple of others.
On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:43 PM, DougEdmunds wrote:
> Shouldn't the Glamour-Morphic-Theme package be renamed to fall
> under Polymorph-Widgets, like the other themes?
>
> It seem that otherwise, the package system will get cluttered
> with individual theme names. I think of the packaging system
> as most generic to more specific (using the hyphens).
>
> Glamour-Morphic-Theme seems to stick out as not following
> this naming convention.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Glamour-Morphic-Theme-package-rename-tp3332037p3332037.html> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>