https://forum.world.st/the-glamorous-toolkit-project-tp3349849p3354791.html
Thanks for the suggestions.
As I said, you are welcome to participate. It does not have to be much. You can just spend a bit of time to learn Glamour and then play 15 minutes per day :).
> Hi Tudor? do you want to succeed? Do a kind of OB but with multiple selection :)
> I would like to remove, for example, several methods together...
>
> cheers
>
> mariano
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Tudor Girba <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks, Esteban.
>
> Jorge did a nice job at improving it to handle special objects. There are still a couple of situations left, but it is already reliable.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 13 Mar 2011, at 19:33, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> > wow.... GTInspector is really great :)
> > gamorous tools are becoming very interesting... keep going that way!
> >
> > I do believe in the near future GT can replace OB as our default IDE, if we continue improving like this :)
> >
> > cheers,
> > Esteban
> >
> > El 13/03/2011, a las 10:34a.m., Marcus Denker escribió:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think that this is a good idea. Having the Core tools better is definitely a good thing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> One thing to keep in mind is that we need (ass soon as possible) to have *one* set
> >> of tools... with OB we have seen that we have just not the manpower to in parallel
> >> maintain two sets of tools (Core vs. Dev).
> >>
> >> The notion of "Core Tools" is broken. Whichever tools we do in the future need
> >> to *replace* the old tools.
> >>
> >> Marcus
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marcus Denker --
http://www.marcusdenker.de> >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>
>
>
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."