Re: an online class hierarchy?
Posted by
Tom Leylan on
Oct 14, 2004; 9:19pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/an-online-class-hierarchy-tp3371800p3371853.html
"Bill Schwab" <
[hidden email]> wrote in message
news:ckmknm$q9m$
[hidden email]...
> Dolphin has shared queues that are thread-safe. Otherwise, one simply
> does not need to bother having specific classes that provide almost no
> additional functionality compared to the existing collections. Learn
> Smalltalk, and you will find yourself saying things like that, and you
> will mean them.
That is the reason I wanted to see the docs. There appears to be some
differences in the implementations.
> Smalltalk's dynamic typing and use of blocks of code allow things to do
> far more than you might envision. You really have to dive in in order to
> get your brain around it.
No doubt but Smalltalk isn't the only typeless language as you know. I used
to work with Clipper which is both typeless and supports code blocks.
Interestingly BCPL (the precursor to B and ultimately of the C language) was
(and still is) typeless and supports anonymous procedures.
You have to take a breath once in awhile... we're not all heathens.