Login  Register

Re: Writing to the std output

Posted by Nicolás Paez on Apr 26, 2011; 7:37pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Writing-to-the-std-output-tp3423778p3476322.html

I saw this items sent by Marcus previously in this thread:

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3669
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3241

Their status is "FixedWaitingToBePharoed", I would like to work on them so, what should I do? try to do a file in and make it run? is there any documentation about how to "Pharoed code" ?




Saludos!
Nico.
blog: nicopaez.wordpress.com


On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:
There are severa thread discussing this topic:

http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=search_page&node=1294836&query=OSProcess+windows



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes, the OSProcess plugin is not distributed with Windows VMs, so
this will not work on Windows.

Dave

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:34:51PM -0300, Nicol?s Paez wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to follow the advice using OSProcess but I get an error
> message saying: "process accessor module not available"
>
> I am running on Win7, could that be the problem?
>
>
> Saludos!
> Nico.
> blog: nicopaez.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:38 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:46:01PM +0200, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 4 April 2011 13:55, Benjamin <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > You have to add a new primitive I think ...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > there was a discussion about adding it to Cog VMs.. but i don't know
> > > > details.
> > > > It could be there out of the box... just need to find it :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I don't know why I remember some Cog extensions in StandardFileStream or
> > > something like that that could directly write to the standard
> > output...but
> > > maybe I am just dreaming.
> > >
> > > Anyway wouldn't OSProcess do the job?
> >
> > Yes of course. Specifically for debugging support, see the #trace, #trace:
> > and #debug: methods. Handy if you are trying to debug something that might
> > drop you into an emergency evaluator. It also is running from the VM, so
> > it avoids timing confusion related to Smalltalk process scheduling and
> > flushing the ouput stream.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >