Just a note: Mondrian does not force anyone to use a DSL :). Most people just chose to use it because the API was better. It's not that much different in Roassal, but that is not an important topic :).
> an important one. you can use roassal without been forced to use a dsl.
> Then you have a much better way to handle interaction and also the camera (zoom)
>
> Stef
>
>
> On May 17, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Alexandre Bergel
>> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Roassal graphically renders objects using short and expressive Smalltalk
>>> expressions. A large set of interactions are offered for a better user
>>> experience. Painting, brushing, interconnecting, zooming, drag and dropping
>>> will just make you more intimate with any arbitrary object model.
>>>
>>> Screenshot available
>>> on
http://objectprofile.com/pier/Products/Roassal/Screenshots>>
>> I don't understand the differences with Mondrian and the screenshots
>> don't help me (probably because they are too small).
>>
>> --
>> Damien Cassou
>>
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st>>
>> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
>> popular by not having them." James Iry
>>
>
>