Re: Can Pharo meet all your computing needs?
Posted by
Trygve on
Aug 26, 2014; 10:57am
URL: https://forum.world.st/Can-Pharo-meet-all-your-computing-needs-tp4774250p4774826.html
It's very vague; I'm thinking as I write. My off-the-cuff answer:
Start from Alan's definition of object orientation: "
... Thus its semantics are a bit like having
thousands and thousands of computers all hooked together by a
very fast network." The BOOK consists of its own
objects as well as objects anywhere on the net. The remote objects
may be written by anybody in any language, but they communicate with
the BOOK according to a fixed message interaction contract.
(Contrast with procedure call interfaces).
There will be many ways for linking users with producers. Google?
Alan Kay once said something like "an operating system is what the
language designers omitted to include in their language". Smalltalk
was built directly on top of the hardware microcode; it was its own
operating system rather than an app. The BOOK should be similar.
More like iOS than an app.
This is fun
--Trygve
-------------------
I am using the term BOOK rather than Dynabook because Alan Kay
has the moral copyright to the latter and he may not agree with
what we are doing.
On 25.08.2014 16:15, S Krish wrote:
" The Dynabook SW architecture must be open so that owners can
safely install functionality ('apps') that is available in a
marketplace. (The i-pad with its hardware and its
marketplace for apps is at the back of my mind.)"
Can the intent be expanded a bit more. Is this an intent to have
a Pharo / ST / Dynabook based marketplace or more extensive ?