Do you think Roassal can replace Morphic at all?

2014-09-16 20:07 GMT+04:00 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]>:

In the word “submorph” there are two important parts. “sub” and “morph”. Roassal support subelements, but only one morph is around, the trachel morph that contains all the drawing.
Why staying in Morphic? Morphic does not scale well, does not have layout, and morphs are hardly composable with other morphs :-)

Cheers,
Alexandre


On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:13 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:54 PM, "abergel [via Smalltalk]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Can you describe a bit more what you need? In Roassal, you do not have submorph, but do you really need them?
> Yes, I want to create a Self-like world that is also zoomable, so you could say the whole purpose is to have submorphs ;)
> Cheers,
> Sean
>

> View this message in context: Re: Zoomable & Infinitely scrollable PasteupMorph
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.