Re: Non-evaluating and / or
Posted by
Jan Blizničenko on
Apr 03, 2015; 7:52pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Non-evaluating-and-or-tp4817211p4817419.html
Of course, how could I have missed it before, thank you both :)
Jan
Blondeau Vincent wrote
Hello,
You should but a block after "and:".
If you don't, the instruction will be always executed...
The block represents a kind of conditional action.
So if you want to do it works :
false and: [ Transcript open ]
Hoping that it will help,
Best,
Vincent BLONDEAU
Peter Uhnák wrote
Hi,
that's because you need to pass a block, since you want to postpone to
execution.
i.e. false and: [Transcript open]. (otherwise the binary operation
Transcript open will take precedence over keyword false and:)
You can always look at the implementation of those things — I always learn
something from it. :)
»and: alternativeBlock«
Peter