reading through Fossil... I think one could turn GitFileTree in a
FossilFileTree in a matter of hours, at most days. If you want to work
with Fossil, I would encourage you to explore this way.
> Hi,
>
> Please don't move source code to git, only bug tracker (or even try
> Bitbucket before or something else).
>
> I try to evade git as hell. Yep, I'm in a minority, but after trying
> git, svn, arch, bazaar, mercurial, trac and fossil I will keep the last
> one only (kind of a "GiHub in a box" on only 1.5 Mb self-contained
> simple to use and install binary). For the curious about Fossil at [1]
> you can find the workflow and at [2] some (biased) quotes about it
> versus git :-) (of course you could find this biased versus thing all
> the time for anything, but at least is a call to have a panoramic view
> before any choosing of a tool).
>
> [1]
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/concepts.wiki#workflow> [2]
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/quotes.wiki>
> One of the main reason that made git so popular was undoubtedly the
> Linux kernel community, but I don't understand why a tool that is suited
> for a thousand developers community and project should be forced into
> every development project and community. Its like a bazooka for killing
> mosquitoes with gratuitous complexity most of the times.
>
> I really like the integration, fine grained control and smoothness of
> Monticello in Pharo/Smalltalk for working with objects, not files. The
> only thing I'm missing is named and visual branches. But having a tool
> that has a cumbersome work flow, is difficult to install and all the
> time gets in your way is precisely the opposite of Monticello or any
> improvement we should be looking for on what we have now. Monticello (or
> fossil for that matter) is newbie friendly, Git is not.
>
> Please, only migrate to file based control system when it has the same
> smoothness of Monticello and hopefully with Git as an option, not before.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Offray
>
> El 07/04/15 a las 10:44, stephan escribió:
>>
>>
>> On 07-04-15 16:53, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>> We will soon have to change our bug trackers.
>>> What about taking this opportunity and moving to GIT?
>>
>> I very much like using git and github for doing small commits to
>> text repositories like PFTE. I would love to have a nicely
>> integrated workflow for source code too. The work by (a.o)
>> Thierry makes me confident that we'll be able to achieve that
>> in the not too far future. At the moment however, we are not even
>> able to reliably find the git executable on all platforms.
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
>