Smalltalk - Re: Can we have NeoCSV, and NeoJSON included in the base image?

Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Re: Can we have NeoCSV, and NeoJSON included in the base image?

Posted by CyrilFerlicot on May 02, 2015; 5:28pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Can-we-have-NeoCSV-and-NeoJSON-included-in-the-base-image-tp4823765p4823786.html

What to integrate and what to not integrate is a sensitive question.

There was a discussion about that last time.

Maybe you can take a look of the discussion here

http://forum.world.st/QualityAssistant-v0-4-td4821070.html#none

That really begin with the answers of stepharo.

Le samedi 2 mai 2015, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> a écrit :

There are arguments on both sides for whether these are included by default. In general, I understand the goal is limit what is distributed with Pharo, since the ConfigurationBrowser makes loading easy. Moose which is based off Pharo comes with a lot more facilities.

In the short term, you might try using a personal-Configuration like this...
https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/loading-projects-and-building-your-own-images-with-metacello/

cheers -ben

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Andy Burnett <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','andy.burnett@knowinnovation.com');" target="_blank">andy.burnett@...> wrote:
I would find it really useful to have some more classes included in the base image. The Neo system would be particularly useful, but I would also find an XML reader valuable.

What is the process for deciding which classes get included by default?

Cheers
Andy

Cheers

Cyril Ferlicot