Smalltalk - Re: Slow compilation on one of my Windows PCs

Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Re: Slow compilation on one of my Windows PCs

Posted by Jan Blizničenko on Jun 30, 2015; 6:33am
URL: https://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4834738.html

Good idea. Results are...

desktop: 664 503 569 bytecodes/sec; 837 14 077 sends/sec.
Linux in VM on desktop: 716 083 916 bytecodes/sec; 74 030 622 sends/sec
notebook: 1 114 861 186 bytecodes/sec; 148 958 012 sends/sec
...results fluctuate by about 10 % on all systems when tried multiple times with some pauses between.

It is right that notebook is almost two times faster (but not 10 times like with compilation), because it has more recent processor (Core i5 mobile vs Athlon 64 x2).

Jan

Clément Bera-4 wrote

What about "1 tinyBenchmarks" ?

Just to know if the VM is slower as a whole or only compilation / source
access ?

2015-06-30 0:36 GMT+02:00 Jan Blizničenko <[hidden email]>:

> And one another benchmark of linux in VM on that desktop PC:
> Roassal loading - 58 s
> compilations per second - avg: 262.4682, min: 257.194, max: 289.684
> ...so the desktop PC is capable of better result and problem is somewhere
> in
> Windows, which I was afraid of...
>
> I'd also like to add to previous Windows tests that with antivirus turned
> on
> everything takes more time approximately by half of original time.
>
> Jan
>
>
> Jan Blizničenko wrote
> > Desktop: 386 s.
> > Notebook: 48 s.
> > Linux in VM on notebook: 27 s.
> >
> >
> > Notebook: compilations per second - avg: 217.7153, min: 5.0, max: 247.258
> > Desktop: compilations per second - avg: 23.1337, min: 19.448, max: 28.155
> > Linux in VM on notebook: compilations per second - avg:
> 529.0066600000001,
> > min: 5.0, max: 573.97
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4834713.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>