> Am 02.08.15 um 14:11 schrieb webwarrior:
>  > I was surprised when discovered that in Pharo comparison is not
> defined for
>  > lists, arrays and similar datastructures.
>  >
>  > Because in almost every programming language (F#, Python, Javascript
> just to
>  > name few) you can compare lists, arrays, etc. By convention, the
> ordering is
>  > lexicographical, just like in strings.
>
> BTW: This would be SortedCollection, not OrderedCollection or its
> superclass.
> Still I am not convinced that I really need an implementation of #< in
> SequencableCollection. Too many ways to interpret what greater or equal
> or lower could mean...
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://forum.world.st/Comparison-for-SequencableCollection-tp4840704p4840706.html
>
> To unsubscribe from Comparison for SequencableCollection, click here
> <
> NAML
> <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>