Posted by pdigonzelli1 on Aug 18, 2015; 4:32pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Fwd-ANN-Magma-1-5-tp4843768p4843845.html

Yes I checkesd. It is by far better approach to pharo and  I like it very much.
The problem i found was when i stress mongo, it lost some transactions (i.e  10000 rewrites lost about 80 or more don't remember exactly) .
In bussiness apps i cannot take that risk.





Ing. Pablo Digonzelli
Software Solutions
IP-Solutiones SRL
Metrotec SRL
25 de Mayo 521
San Miguel de Tucumán
Email: [hidden email]
[hidden email]
Cel: 5493815982714

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Esteban Lorenzano" <[hidden email]>
Para: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <[hidden email]>
CC: [hidden email], "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]>, [hidden email]
Enviados: Martes, 18 de Agosto 2015 12:45:05
Asunto: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Magma 1.5

> On 18 Aug 2015, at 17:20, Pablo R. Digonzelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I can colaborate. I do not know if i have the time and technical skills to do it alone, but for shure i can colaborate.
> I think magma will be a very interesting option for object persistence in pharo.
> I am currently working with garage and glorp and i suffers the innecesary complexity and other bad things thet persistence layer introduce in developing pharo apps.

have you checked voyage? (to work with a MongoDB)… it will avoid all the pain of using a relational database.

Esteban

ps: But yes, I do believe having magma would be cool too.