> On Jul 23, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Jan Blizničenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> As far as I looked, only two rounding methods are center and aboveCenter
> (which has no senders in my image by the way and I do not even see purpose
> of it)... all other (like leftCenter) are getting value from mentioned self
> center.
>
> So, the easiest way seems to subclass Rectangle and make something like
> Precise/Float/NotRounded/I'mNotVeryGoodAtNaming Rectangle
> which will have just these two methods different, so there will be also this
> PreciseRectangle which is not rounding down, but original one stays
> unchanged.
>
> However, the rounding seems to me like an extension/addition/subtype of
> general rectangle and I think that it should not be default behavior of
> something called just Rectangle, it should be more like Rectangle (not
> rounded) with subclass IntegerRectangle or something like that. I know,
> there are many senders right now which are dependent on the rounding, but I
> just think it should not be like that, or should it?
>
> Jan
>
>
> abergel wrote
>> Maybe we can introduce a new rectangle class.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Rectangle-center-rounding-tp4837980p4838853.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>