Posted by
abergel on
Sep 22, 2015; 12:19am
URL: https://forum.world.st/Question-about-MooseChef-tp4851322p4851416.html
There is implementor of atScope: in my image.
I have the last version of Famix-Core loaded…
Alexandre
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Anne Etien <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In order to solve all these problems, we developed the new version of MooseChef a.k.a MooseQuery. There are two methods atScope: and toScope: taking a famix class name (e.g. atScope: FAMIXMethod) to go up (respectively down) in the containment tree until entities of the specified type.
>
> Cheers,
> Anne
> Le 21 sept. 2015 à 16:17, Alexandre Bergel <
[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
>> hi!
>>
>> Why is there not a method atMethodScope?
>>
>> Also, why is there not a atClassScope? Apparently this method is deprecated and one should use atTypeScope instead. However, a class define a type, but a type does not necessarily defines a class. It may define an interface. I have the impression that atTypeScope and atClassScope are both relevant. We could even introduce atInterfaceScope.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev