>> I do not know if what you propose (which can be better than what I was
>> planning) requires to change fileSystem, my goal was not to change for
>> now but just make sure that I can get cheaply file to print themselves
>> into kind of objects I can manipulate again.
>>
>> Now if what you propose is better, then first we should introduce a
>> logic to handle :file :memory
>>
>> And I'm not against so plese push it but this is outside of my little
>> goal for now.
> You're right. Your solution is much simpler - therefore I'd go with
> your solution for now.
>
>> would be nice. Push this idea. Once the community agrees then we can
>> easily extend the printOn: behavior.
> I'll try to work through the FS code and see if I can get the stuff
> I'm thinking about implemented.