> On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Udo Schneider <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/16 10:52, stepharo wrote:
>> So this is what I was trying to get done.
>> I do not know if what you propose (which can be better than what I was
>> planning) requires to change fileSystem, my goal was not to change for
>> now but just make sure that I can get cheaply file to print themselves
>> into kind of objects I can manipulate again.
>>
>> Now if what you propose is better, then first we should introduce a
>> logic to handle :file :memory
>>
>> And I'm not against so plese push it but this is outside of my little
>> goal for now.
> You're right. Your solution is much simpler - therefore I'd go with your solution for now.
>
>> would be nice. Push this idea. Once the community agrees then we can
>> easily extend the printOn: behavior.
> I'll try to work through the FS code and see if I can get the stuff I'm thinking about implemented.
>
>> Did you watch the excellent talk of marcus at ESUG?
>> Because I think incrementally
> One of the first videos/slidedecks I watched - the title made me curious. My key take-away is that it's better to implement the cheap/simple/non-perfect enhancement now than never (too late) the perfect one.