> Hi Hernan,
>
> apparently BioSmalltalk is the faster in the field of Bio* platforms
> (BioPerl, BioPython,  BioJava, ...) and the more trendy:
> http://www.ijcseonline.org/spl_pub_paper/PID%2023.pdf
>
> I would love to believe in that ;-)
>
> But if you read carefully the paper, you will found that authors has
> made a dramatic mistake ... They think that Pharo was the name of
> BioSmalltalk ... and then they compare with Google Trends, Pharo
> against BioPerl, BioPython, ...
>
> Anyways the statement that BioSmalltalk is the faster is maybe true :-)
> Hernan did you know this paper ?
>
> Regards,