> On 5 Jul 2017, at 14:39, Tim Mackinnon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> So does that mean we should use the Pharo5 vm for production then? It sounds like 6 is still a bit bleeding edge and for production applications we should wait for 6.1?
>
> At the moment it seems a little chaotic - we all like the new features, and 6 is definitely a breath of fresh air - however if you want to deploy something commercially then you need stability.
>
>
> Tim
>
>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 19:28, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 20:08, Bernhard Pieber <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What VM would you recommend for a production app on macOS Sierra?
>>> - Pharo 6, right?
>> yes
>>
>>> - I assume 32-bit because 64-bit is still experimental, right?
>> not particularly, you can download it and use it.
>> some tests fails but people is already using it (iceberg will not work, but AFAIK, is the only thing that does not works).
>>
>>> - The one I get with „curl get.pharo.org | bash“ has a reproducible crash when typing (https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/issues/141). So it can’t be the recommended one, right?
>> nevertheless is the current recommended one, and that bug is annoying us all :)
>>
>> but we hope to be able to fix it eventually, of course :)
>>
>> cheers!
>> Esteban
>>
>>>
>>> I must admit I am quite confused.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bernhard
>>
>>
>
>