Posted by
CyrilFerlicot on
Oct 10, 2017; 2:09pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Users-of-TDependencyQueries-tp4980643p4980689.html
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Anne Etien <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> I don’t understand the end of the last sentence.
>
I mean that if we do that, it will be easier to implement new
FAMIXEntity and/or to adapt existing models to works with Moose-Query.
Also, if all FAMIXEntity does not use the Trait, we cannot
#queryAllIncomingAssociations in Tools manipulating FAMIXEntities
without the fear that it will break because one find of entity might
not use the Trait.
> Not so sure, because as it is currently done, FAMIXComment can not answer to method like queryAllIncomingAssociations, because it is not linked to other entities through any association just a container relationship that is not an association. It can be the case of other entities (I have no idea which one).
>
What is the problem if we ask the incoming association to an entity
that has none? Currently FAMIXType understand
#queryOutgoingInvocations but it will never return one since it is not
a Behavioural entity.
> Anne
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.frhttp://www.synectique.eu2 rue Jacques Prévert 01,
59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev