>>Hi Gabriel
>
>>This is cool.
>>Thanks for sharing it with us.
>>I really want an object responsible for deploying an app. :)
>>Your effort is nice in that directory. Keep pushing
>
>>Stef
> Thanks!!!
>
> Maxi Tabacman suggests me to reify the deployment process.
> I thought of something like to get up a minimal image from inside the
> development image, then to start the deployment process from the development
> image.
> I suppose that I would need to use Espell Object Spaces (Guillermo Polito),
> but in this case, I would need a special virtual machine (Oz Virtual
> Machine)... Something like Tornado, but not using the "Run Fail Grow"
> approach, but using a BaselineOf or ConfigurationOf approach.
> Another idea (simpler than the idea above) is to communicate the two images
> using Teapot or Sockets: The Development image sends orders to the minimal
> image until it becomes on the deployment image.
>
> For the moment I need to test the process (on Pharo 6 and 7) using more
> complex applications until it becomes a reliable process.
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
>