> If understood correctly, when using a tonel file repository to build up an
> image, Pharo seems instead to take the sources from some package-cache,
> which is out of sync, because the tonel file repo was updated from another
> image, with a different cache. I guess I can trick the file system but it is
> for the least very annoying, for the worst unreliable.
>
>
>
> Le 10/12/2017 à 18:16, Hilaire a écrit :
>>
>> I am using tonel format to install from and save to a local repository.
>>
>> How to prevent Monticello/Configuration/Metacello to save packages to the
>> image package-cache dir?
>>
>> Even when installing from a configuration with repo on tonel file format,
>> packages get created in the image package-cache directory.
>>
>> I have read there and there, Pharo gets confused and uses wrongly the
>> package-cache versions and not the local repo.
>
>
> --
> Dr. Geo
> http://drgeo.eu
>
>
>