https://forum.world.st/ZnClient-how-suppress-popup-notifications-tp5121230p5121242.html
returns #myFailure and does not invoke the #defaultAction, nor any UI.
Like I said, you can just catch the exception you want.
> On 2 Sep 2020, at 22:15, Jimmie Houchin <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/2/20 2:36 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> Hi Jimmie,
>>
>>> On 2 Sep 2020, at 20:29, Jimmie Houchin <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Before I get to my problem. I want to thank Sven for the huge effort that had to be made to provide all of the Zinc networking tools. Thank you.
>> Thanks, you're welcome.
>>
>>> I am using ZnClient in an app. It is working fine. But I do not want any UI Notifications. This will eventually be headless on a server. But right now in development when the internet goes out I get a pop up from NameLookupFailure which offers me the options of "Give Up" or "Retry".
>>>
>>> I need to suppress this popup. I already have Error handling code which will catch NameLookupFailure among many other network based errors.
>> I know this is confusing, but this is not a problem. You can simply catch the NameLookupFailure and this will work as expected. The problem is the custom/overwritten NameLookupFailure>>#defaultAction which is doing UI stuff (although this gets handled differently in a headless image as well). IMHO this should be removed.
>>
>> ZnClientTest>>#testIfFailNonExistingHost is an example that does more or less what you want.
>
>
> Yes. In the current stack trace in the debugger it never reaches my Error handling and hits the #defaultAction method.
>
>
> Thanks. That puts me on the path I want to go.
>
> I probably need to learn to read the tests for or as documentation for code. I am not currently in that habit.
>
>
>>> Also, is there a better way to check if the network is up other than simply making a request and either getting a successful response or an Error?
>> This is not such an easy problem to solve. Doing something simple, like accessing a known host, is one way (but never 100% since that host might be down on itself).
>>
>> There is also the problem of timeouts (i.e. very slow networks).
>>
>> One of my experimental projects,
https://github.com/svenvc/NeoDNS, does contains something called NeoNetworkState that tests internet connectivity by doing a DNS call. But this probably goes to far.
>>
>> HTH,
>
> Helps tremendously. Currently when I get a network error, I have a loop which polls the least resource consuming URL on the server that I need to access. I exit the loop upon a successful response and continue with my app's main loop. I figure that lets me know that networking is back up and the server I need is responding. Covers all my bases. I just wanted to know if I was overlooking something that all you smart people who spend way more time than I do on this stuff had a solution. I couldn't think of an easy generic solution that could be created.
>
> Again thanks.
>
>
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>> Thanks for any help.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jimmie