Hi,
How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef." _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? you do not need a pragma. Instead, override #expectedFailures and return an array of selectors. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Actually it would make sense to use pragmas as the information gets
closer to the test. Any taker? Adrian On Sep 22, 2009, at 13:24 , Damien Cassou wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? > > you do not need a pragma. Instead, override #expectedFailures and > return an array of selectors. > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
#expectedFailures could be implemented like this and we could support
strategies: TestCase class>>expectedFailures ^ (Pragma allNamed: #expectedFailure from: self to: TestCase) collect: [ :each | each selector ] Lukas 2009/10/1 Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]>: > Actually it would make sense to use pragmas as the information gets > closer to the test. Any taker? > > Adrian > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 13:24 , Damien Cassou wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? >> >> you do not need a pragma. Instead, override #expectedFailures and >> return an array of selectors. >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> >> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >> popular by not having them." James Iry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I was thinking that we discuss with james foster and niall about a
versions for all the smalltalk in Suni3.3 Do you recall it lukas? On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > #expectedFailures could be implemented like this and we could support > strategies: > > TestCase class>>expectedFailures > ^ (Pragma allNamed: #expectedFailure from: self to: TestCase) > collect: [ :each | each selector ] > > Lukas > > 2009/10/1 Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]>: >> Actually it would make sense to use pragmas as the information gets >> closer to the test. Any taker? >> >> Adrian >> >> On Sep 22, 2009, at 13:24 , Damien Cassou wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>> How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? >>> >>> you do not need a pragma. Instead, override #expectedFailures and >>> return an array of selectors. >>> >>> -- >>> Damien Cassou >>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>> >>> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >>> popular by not having them." James Iry >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
2009/10/1 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> I was thinking that we discuss with james foster and niall about a > versions for all the smalltalk in Suni3.3 > Do you recall it lukas? Yeah, we listed the important features. Expected failures was one. Being able to categorize tests was another one, but I don't remember the other ones right now. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |