the glamorous toolkit project

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: the glamorous toolkit project

Stéphane Ducasse

On Mar 15, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Toon Verwaest wrote:

> Yes I'm on Ubuntu 10.10. If you tell me what the steps are, I'll try it out.

remove the plugin
and look into the FAQ or google in the squeak-vm mailing-list

may be install squeak4.2 vm

>
> On 03/15/2011 01:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> are you on linux?
>> because the UUID plugin on certain distributions is crashing.
>>
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Toon Verwaest wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/15/2011 01:13 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Toon Verwaest wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If only Cog for linux wouldn't crash whenever I try to save code to monticello... this would streamline the process :)
>>>> did you check the UUID pluggin?
>>> Meaning?
>>>>> If I have some time I'll look into it... Eliot!
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Toon
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/14/2011 08:31 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Mariano,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the suggestions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I said, you are welcome to participate. It does not have to be much. You can just spend a bit of time to learn Glamour and then play 15 minutes per day :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Mar 2011, at 19:34, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Tudor?  do you want to succeed?  Do a kind of OB but with multiple selection :)
>>>>>>> I would like to remove, for example, several methods together...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mariano
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Tudor Girba<[hidden email]>    wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks, Esteban.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jorge did a nice job at improving it to handle special objects. There are still a couple of situations left, but it is  already reliable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13 Mar 2011, at 19:33, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wow.... GTInspector is really great :)
>>>>>>>> gamorous tools are becoming very interesting... keep going that way!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do believe in the near future GT can replace OB as our default IDE, if we continue improving like this :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>> Esteban
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El 13/03/2011, a las 10:34a.m., Marcus Denker escribió:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think that this is a good idea. Having the Core tools better is definitely a good thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One thing to keep in mind is that we need (ass soon as possible) to have *one* set
>>>>>>>>> of tools... with OB we have seen that we have just not the manpower to in parallel
>>>>>>>>> maintain two sets of tools (Core vs. Dev).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The notion of "Core Tools" is broken. Whichever tools we do in the future need
>>>>>>>>> to *replace* the old tools.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      Marcus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>>>>>>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


12